[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1002295: Uploaded the files



Am 28.07.22 um 16:49 schrieb Scorpion2185:
I see "multi-timer (0.2.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium" in the changelog, what version should I use instead?
The upstream version is 0.2.0.
Mentor's warning wanted me to use a -x.x format.

You have to use 0.2.0-1, as I have already pointed out in my previous email (Debian revision has to be -1).
The lintian warning about the NMU was because of the "" around realroot.

I removed the "".

Fine, so now lintian generates a maintainer-upload-has-incorrect-version-number because of the -0.1 revision.

I updated the watch file. Is it correct now?

Nope. Please read man uscan.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Wednesday, July 27th, 2022 at 8:18 PM, Bastian Germann <bastiangermann@fishpost.de> wrote:


Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:34:23 +0200 Bastian Germann bage@debian.org wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:57:13 +0000 Scorpion2185 Scorpion2185@proton.me wrote:

I updated the files again, no lintian errors.
There is warning about man page, the author changed the name of the bin the man page is there.

There is still 1 lintian error:
debian-rules-is-dh_make-template

...and several warnings:
source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number (Please use the same name/email in changelog and Maintainer)


d/changelog:
There is also the problem of a bad Debian revision. This has to be -1 for an initial package version.
Please also remove the ”” around realroot.

syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright

For me, the following lintian information is also a blocker:
debian-watch-file-is-missing


The provided watch file does not work because there are no git tags.


Reply to: