[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- restricted user shell



Hi,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:
   * drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
   * drop debian/patches/format_security.diff

Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes when you have not addressed his previous comments.
You have not included an explanation about the patches.

I know the problem is where:

   * drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
I do not understand why the patch from bunk[0] fix the license part in
intprops.h? And the code is applied into upstream[1]. Now I think the
different is
```
/* -*- buffer-read-only: t -*- vi: set ro: */
/* DO NOT EDIT! GENERATED AUTOMATICALLY! */
/* intprops.h -- properties of integer types

   Copyright (C) 2001-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
...
by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
   (at your option) any later version.
...

You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
```
So the patch will still remained?

   * drop debian/patches/format_security.diff

The patch is applied into upstream[2]. So the patch can be dropped?



Also, the version number does not take a +dfsg without repacking.

This is a quesion that confuses me, because i have lintian info also.
how to understand with "repacking" here? I want to adopt the package with following the original debian version name rule(2.2+dfsg-1).
it seems that i do not got it here:)

When you have provided a version that explains the patch removal or has rebased them on the new version please untag moreinfo from this bug.

Ok, like `tags 1012200 - moreinfo`?

thank you, Bastian

Bo


[0]: https://salsa.debian.org/vimerbf-guest/rush/-/blob/debian/1.8+dfsg-1.1/debian/patches/intprops.patch
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/vimerbf-guest/rush/-/blob/upstream/2.2/gnu/intprops.h
[3]: https://salsa.debian.org/vimerbf-guest/rush/-/blob/upstream/2.2/lib/wordsplit/wordsplit.c#L2889
--
Best Regards,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: