[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1009313: RFS: nginx/1.18.0-10 -- small, powerful, scalable web/proxy server



Can I suggest that this be rejected as it has no review from the Debian Maintainers Team (on git or otherwise)?

(I've recently been added as a maintainer on the Git side of this for the Salsa repo, though not an uploader *yet* with my DM rights, but as we manage this on Git VCS... this should be a merge into the existing repo)

There has been zero review of any such split requests, and this really should go via Git and merge requests and stuff.


Question to the original poster of the RFS: *why*?  NGINX packaging has not yet adapted to things.


And to MIA/mentors: the package is not yet 'abandoned', I'm going to get mentors sponsoring until a DD adds nginx to my uploads. (see my commits on https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx - i'm rapidly working on an RC fix for the RC bug that prevents nginx from migrating to testing as of now, since we have a rollback of the Lua module version now in Salsa)


Thomas

On 4/11/22 16:24, Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Miao,

Please do not skip a version (or leave it UNRELEASED). If this is a team upload (not in changelog...) and the team has confirmed splitting the package, please reference the okay statement. Else, nobody will touch this massive change.

I am tagging moreinfo. When you have provided the requested info, please untag.

Thanks,
Bastian




Reply to: