Re: Package upload failed only due GPG expiration?
Hi Filip,
otherwise, I would just sponsor you upload(s) in the meantime. Justping
me if needed.
Cheers
Ole
Filip Hroch <hroch@physics.muni.cz> writes:
> Hi Sebastian, and Andrey,
>
> thank you very much for that help. I decided to practise my patience,
> there's no hurry for Fitspng upload.
>
>
> Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> writes:
>
>> On 2022-02-02 16:20:15 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Filip Hroch wrote:
> ...
>>> When a valid signature is not found the uploader indeed doesn't get
>>> any
>>> notifications.
>>> > as well as.
>>> Yes, it's because of key expiration.
>>> Unfortunately I have no idea anymore which is the source of key
>>> data for
>>> the upload processing as that's inconsitent and I don't know if
>>> it's
>>> documented anywhere.
>>
>> From https://keyring.debian.org/
>>
>> "You can check the result with --recv-keys, but note it can take up
>> to 15
>> minutes for your submission to be processed. Your updated key will
>> then
>> be included into the active keyring in our next keyring push (which
>> happens approx. monthly)."
>>
>
> I checked validity of the key on keyring.debian.org GPG server
> via an independent account, during Sunday already. The authoritative
> source of keys is the active keyring, I think.
>
> All the situation is my fail. I has prepare the upload since begin
> of January, so I has prolonged the key approx. two weaks ago, but
> notified only Ubuntu's Hockey puck, and forget of the Debian's master.
>
> Thank you very much,
> FH
> --
> F. Hroch <hroch@physics.muni.cz>, Masaryk University,
> Dept. of theor. physics and astrophysics, Brno, Moravia, CZ
Reply to: