Il 08/01/2022 13:15, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 21:47:49 +0100 Fabio Fantoni <fantonifabio@tiscali.it> wrote:first time I do a repack in many years (if I remember correctly), seems ok from a fast look but if you want check is right probably is better, after I'll push also to the Debian/memtest86plus: https://salsa.debian.org/fantu-guest/memtest86plus/-/commits/debian/experimentalIl 07/01/2022 21:24, Bastian Germann ha scritto: > On 07.01.22 21:10, Fabio Fantoni wrote: >> I did wrong to do a QA upload? >> No, a QA upload is fine. But the maintainer should be kept "Debian QA > Group" to be formally correct.Ah... sry, I saw only now the mistake of not merging debian/control change, fixed and did another upload to mentorsa.out should be excluded. Please do not forget to add a +dfsg suffix to the upstream version.
Missing copyright info in the following files: bootsect.S dmi.c head.S multiboot.[ch] serial.h smp.h
tried to do: https://salsa.debian.org/fantu-guest/memtest86plus/-/commit/1d24dd88c9f53110d20cc70769f6e0c7b63ef04d
but smp.h have only "partial" header, license I suppose can be one of the BSD but I'm not sure what to put exactly in d/copyright
can you tell me what I should do with smp.h entry and if there are other changes to do about other entries or are ok please?
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature