Hi Vincent, I'm very glad to see that you've been working on this. From an initial skim of your package, things look very good, and I'm more pleased to see that you've based your work off of binutils-sh-elf and the PackagingLessCommonBinutilsTargets guide. About the build failure Adam had, I'm afraid a breaking change was introduced in the autoconf2.69 package (2.69-3) that affects all of our packages: > autoconf2.69 (2.69-3) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Don't apply the add-runstatedir backport, not needed in the > context of this package, and generates different output not > needed for GCC. I have no idea how we're going to address this. I think I'll file a bug and see if they're willing to revert as soon as I can identify all of the affected packages.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part