[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#998096: marked as done (RFS: pelican/4.7.1+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- blog aware, static website generator)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2021 13:09:47 +0200
with message-id <0fb3e4a4-3b29-ff71-5c97-5958dfce85e5@gmx.de>
and subject line Re: RFS: pelican/4.6.0+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- blog aware, static website generator
has caused the Debian Bug report #998096,
regarding RFS: pelican/4.7.1+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- blog aware, static website generator
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pelican":

* Package name : pelican
Version : 4.6.0+dfsg-1.1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : http://getpelican.com/
* License : AGPL-3
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/pelican
Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

pelican - blog aware, static website generator
pelican-doc - blog aware, static website generator (documentation)
python-pelican - transitional dummy package
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: 

https://mentors.debian.net/package/pelican/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pelican/pelican_4.6.0+dfsg-1.1.dsc 

Changes since the last upload:

pelican (4.6.0+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium

--- End Message ---
Reply to: