[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Reproducible builds erroneous ticks



Hello mentors,

I was reviewing one of my own packages on the QA page¹ and was surprised to notice it gets full marks for CI/Rep. “Surprised? Isn’t that a good thing?” you say. It’s surprising because I’ve been tracking an upstream bug that I *know* makes this package’s build not-reproducible. Clicking into the Rep tick mark, I note it’s indeed flagged as not-reproducible. Is the tick mark a mistake? Or am I just wanting to judge my own package more harshly than CI judges it?

Thanks,
Matt

¹ https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=matthew.fernandez%40gmail.com

Reply to: