Bug#994564: RFS: sosreport/4.2-1 -- Set of tools to gather troubleshooting data from a system
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:53:36PM -0400, Eric Desrochers wrote:
> * Package name : sosreport
> Version : 4.2-1
> sosreport (4.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * New 4.2 upstream release.
> - This release contains numerous improvements
> and bug fixes to several components within sos,
> including an overhaul to the project's test suite
> and infrastructure.
> .
> * For more details, full release note is available here:
> - https://github.com/sosreport/sos/releases/tag/4.2
> .
> * Former patches, now fixed:
> - d/p/0002-fix-dict-order-py38-incompatibility.patch
> - d/p/0003-systemd-prefer-resolvectl-over-systemd-resolve.patch
> .
> * Remaining patches:
> - d/p/0001-debian-change-tmp-dir-location.patch
Hi!
There's an obviously misplaced file: /usr/config/sos.conf
The man pages are mangled, at least their headers.
Upstreamish issues:
* when run, it spams about missing kernel modules despites them being
built-in. It _tries_ to detect them, but by looking into a bogus
path (/usr/lib/modules/%s/modules.builtin -- it's in /lib/); it should
check /sys/module/ instead of assuming the running kernel is available
on the disk.
* it fails to list running services, and probably many more. I see it
hard-codes systemd specific commands instead of rc-agnostic ones.
And upstreamish but really should be patched: the "Debian" module knows
only about wheezy and jessie...
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ < thunder> perhaps we can just call rude people "attitudinally
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ challenged", designate them as disabled, and then
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ object to any criticism towards them on the basis
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ that it would violate the CoC...
Reply to: