Bug#993221: marked as done (RFS: lebiniou-data/3.61.1-1 -- datafiles for Le Biniou)
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2021 00:22:21 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] YSq3HQzxYPOdAvzZ@isildor.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Re: Bug#993221: RFS: lebiniou-data/3.61.1-1 -- datafiles for Le Biniou
has caused the Debian Bug report #993221,
regarding RFS: lebiniou-data/3.61.1-1 -- datafiles for Le Biniou
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
993221: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993221
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lebiniou-data":
* Package name : lebiniou-data
Version : 3.61.1-1
Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel <olivier@biniou.info>
* URL : https://biniou.net
* License : GPL-2+
Section : graphics
It builds this binary package:
lebiniou-data - datafiles for Le Biniou
The package appears to be lintian-clean.
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/lebiniou-data
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lebiniou-data/lebiniou-data_3.61.1-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release 3.61.1.
* debian/tests/control: Updated.
Regards,
--
Olivier Girondel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution!
Just a note: The changes were only debian package changes,
just bump the Debian revision to -2 ... no need to cut a new
upstream release...
--
tobi
--- End Message ---
Reply to: