Bug#992859: RFS: opendmarc/1.4.1.1-1 -- Milter implementation of DMARC
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opendmarc":
* Package name : opendmarc
Version : 1.4.1.1-1
Upstream Author : The Trusted Domain Project
* URL : http://www.trusteddomain.org/opendmarc
* License : GPL-3+ with AutoConf exception, BSD-3-clause and SOSL, BSD-2-clause
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/kitterman/opendmarc
Section : mail
It builds those binary packages:
libopendmarc-dev - Headers and development libraries for the OpenDMARC library
libopendmarc2 - Library for DMARC validation and reporting
opendmarc - Milter implementation of DMARC
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/opendmarc/
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opendmarc/opendmarc_1.4.1.1-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
opendmarc (1.4.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ David Bürgin ]
* New upstream release
- Refresh patches, delete patches incorporated upstream
- Update copyright information
* Add new patches:
- hold-quarantined-messages-doc.patch: Correct HoldQuarantinedMessages doc
- insheader.patch: Insert trace headers at index 0
- check_domain.patch: Make function check_domain static
- arcseal-segfaults.patch: Fix segfaults in ARC-Seal headers
- conf_refcnt.patch: Remove invalid assert statement
- free-arcdomain.patch: Fix memory leak when evaluating ARC chain
- arc-override-quarantine.patch: Add ARC override for policy "quarantine"
* Set "Rules-Requires-Root: no" in d/control
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.0 without further change
.
[ Camaleón ]
* [INTL:es] Spanish translation of the debconf template (Closes: #987480)
The Lintian error and warning are problems of Lintian, not of this
package. (Lintian needs an update for the Standards-Version bump, and
the /usr/lib/systemd/system issue is work in progress #992465.)
Thank you!
David
Reply to: