Re: avoiding autoremoval for what seems like a spurious build error
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:48 PM Stephen Sinclair <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> In any case, I was not so much asking for help building/reproducing,
> as I was asking what I can do other than to reply to the bug, which
> seems not to be eliciting a response, to either avoid or delay the
> auto-removal process. Is auto-removal policy documented somewhere?
For that you'd follow Tobias' suggestion:
> I'd either downgrade it to non RC and tag it unreproducible or close it with
> the request to reopen if it pops up again.
Practically, that means you'd either downgrade the bug's severity 
to "important" or below to make it non-RC , or close it .
The connection between RC bugs and auto-removal is documented here .