Re: Failed build for seqan2 on i386
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 04:30:48PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:21:38AM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> > > But other 32bit architectures like armel and armhf are passing. So I
> > > fail to see why exactly i386 is failing. Is this possibly an effect of
> > > bug #917851?
> > >
> > Maybe the memory of the whole builder is exhausted.
> Then it would get an OOM, not a *virtual* memory error.
Seems the best idea is to ask ftpmaster to remove seqan2 i386 since
chances that this software is used here is extremely low anyway.