Re: Failed build for seqan2 on i386
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:21:38AM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> > But other 32bit architectures like armel and armhf are passing. So I
> > fail to see why exactly i386 is failing. Is this possibly an effect of
> > bug #917851?
> Maybe the memory of the whole builder is exhausted. In this case it may help
> to limit the amount of parallel running processes. On i386 we have "make
> -j4" on armel just "make -j1" .
Do you suggest I should enforce this in d/rules or is it possible to ask
autobuild maintainers to trigger a rebuild with this setting?