[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#980261: RFS: jgmenu/4.3.0-1 [RFP] -- Simple X11 menu



X-Debbugs-CC: mati75@linuxmint.pl jgm323@gmail.com


On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:38:16 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Mateusz_=c5=81ukasik?=
<mati75@linuxmint.pl> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jgmenu":
> 
>   * Package name    : jgmenu
>     Version         : 4.3.0-1
>     Upstream Author : Johan Malm <jgm323@gmail.com>
>   * URL             : https://jgmenu.github.io/
>   * License         : LGPL-2+, GPL-2+, Expat, LGPL-3+
>   * Vcs             : https://github.com/mati75/jgmenu
>     Section         : x11
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
>    jgmenu-xfce4-panel-applet - xfce4-panel applet for jgmenu
>    jgmenu - Simple X11 menu
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
> 
>    https://mentors.debian.net/package/jgmenu/
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
> 
>    dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jgmenu/jgmenu_4.3.0-1.dsc
> 
> Changes for the initial release:
> 
>   jgmenu (4.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>   .
>     * Initial release. (Closes: #882210)


One major problem: debian/copyright in your work says that the whole
project is licensed under GPL-2+, however the LICENSE file from
upstream only gives GPLv2 license text. The README file also does not
mention that the whole project is licensed under GPLv2 **or later**.

Could you please contact upstream to clarify the case? The best output
would be adding a "the whole project is licensed under GPLv2 or later"
sentense in the README file, which would make things clear to everyone.

P.S. I took a look at upstream's debian/copyright file at
https://github.com/johanmalm/jgmenu/blob/master/debian/copyright , in
which the upstream only mentioned GPL-2, not GPL-2+. If upstream is
only willing to release the whole project under GPL-2-only, using GPL-
2+ is wrong and must be fixed.

-- 
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: