On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 16:13 +0200, Leon Marz wrote: > I have uploaded a new version of the package with asciidoc-base back > included, but as a duplicate of asciidoc. I hope this is alright. I don't think it is appropriate to duplicate the package like that. I would instead suggest either keeping it as it was before, getting nanoc fixed before removing asciidoc-base or making asciidoc-base into a transitional package depending on asciidoc. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part