[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys



On Thursday, September 3, 2020 4:09:59 AM EDT Ansgar wrote:
> If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its
> implementation doesn't matter to users and probably shouldn't be part
> of a package's name
It's both a command-line utility and a library, albeit a library applications 
are unlikely to depend on.

To the submitter, thanks for packaging solo-python! I'd been watching the wnpp 
bug and the package works well for me and looks great.

I've identified a minor upstream issue pertaining to not allowing solo to be 
run as root doing 'solo key rng feedkernel', but that's for them to tackle:
https://github.com/solokeys/solo-python/issues/96

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: