Bug#968692: RFS: peony-extensions/3.0.0-1 [RC] -- Peony qt extensions
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jianfengli@ubuntukylin.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "peony-extensions":
* Package name : peony-extensions
Version : 3.0.0-1
Upstream Author : He Meihong <hemeihong@kylinos.cn>
* URL : https://github.com/ukui/peony-extensions
* License : LGPL-3+
* Vcs : https://github.com/ukui/peony-extensions
Section : x11
It builds those binary packages:
peony-extensions - Peony qt extensions
peony-admin - Peony plugin for open files or directories as admin
peony-set-wallpaper - Peony plugin for right click a picture to set as
wallpaper
peony-extension-computer-view - Peony plugin for displaying computer:/// with
more information
peony-open-terminal - Peony plugin for opening terminals in arbitrary local
paths
parchives - Peony qt plugin for file compress and uncompress
peony-share - Allows one to quickly share a folder from the Peony file
manager
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/peony-extensions/
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peony-extensions/peony-
extensions_3.0.0-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
peony-extensions (3.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* d/control:
- Add peony-extension-computer-view, peony-set-wallpaper,
peony-admin, peony-extensions.
- Remove hardcodes dependency on libpeony. (Closes: #968661)
Regards,
--
handsome_feng
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=zh_CN:zh
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Reply to: