[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#951420: RFS: sane-backends/1.0.29-1~experimental1 -- API library for scanners -- utilities



Hello Adam,

thanks for your review.

We are this week on a exhibition. 

That's why I can't look for it until next weekend.

CU
Jörg

Am Freitag, den 28.02.2020, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 12:19:44PM +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> >    Package name    : sane-backends
> >    Version         : 1.0.29-1~experimental1
> > Changes since the last upload:
> ["War and Peace" skipped]
> 
> > The build with sbuild (sbuild --no-arch-all && sbuild --no-arch-any 
> > &&
> > sbuild) and pdebuild are ok. The tests with lintian and piuparts
> > and
> > the autopkgtest are also ok.
> 
> Alas, it fail autopkgtests for me:
> 
> autopkgtest [19:12:30]: test start-net: [-----------------------
> + /bin/sed -i /localhost/d /etc/sane.d/saned.conf
> + echo localhost
> + /bin/sed -i s/^#\(pnm\)$/\1/ /etc/sane.d/dll.conf
> + /bin/sed -i s/^# \(localhost\)$/\1/ /etc/sane.d/net.conf
> + /usr/bin/scanimage -d net -L
> + /bin/grep net:+ 
> /usr/bin/wc -l
> Created directory: /var/lib/snmp/mib_indexes
> + CNT=0
> + [ 0 -eq 2 ]
> + exit 100
> autopkgtest [19:12:35]: test start-net: -----------------------]
> autopkgtest [19:12:35]: test start-net:  - - - - - - - - - - results
> - - - - - - - - - -
> start-net            FAIL non-zero exit status 100
> 
> Full log at http://ix.io/2cUE
> 
> 
> Meow!
-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key        : 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:      https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema:  SYR8SJXB
Wire:     @joergfringsfuerst
Skype:    joergpenguin
Ring:     jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: