[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#978717: RFS: openscad/2019.05-4 [RC] -- script file based graphical CAD environment



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a new upload for package "openscad", which I
have been maintaining for a couple years. This upload fixes a FTBFS and is
needed to get openscad back into the archive.

 * Package name    : openscad
   Version         : 2019.05-4
   Upstream Author : Clifford Wolf, Marius Kintel, and others
 * URL             : http://openscad.org/
 * License         : QtCommercial or LGPL-2.1 with some exception or GPL-3, Apache-2.0, PD-trochoids or LGPL-2.1, BSD-2-clause or LGPL-2.1, PD-nefercheprure or LGPL-2.1, GPL-2+ with CGAL exception and pythonparts, AGPL-3, GPL-3+, CC or LGPL-2.1, GPL-3 or LGPL-2.1, LGPL-2.1, zlib, PD, LGPL-2 or LGPL-2.1, CC0-1.0, SIL-OFL, CC-BY-3.0 or LGPL-2.1, MIT, MIT-MCAD or LGPL-2.1, GPL-2+, GPL-2+ with CGAL exception, LGPL-3 or LGPL-2.1, CC0, CC-BY-SA-3.0 or LGPL-2 or LGPL-2.1
 * Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/knielsen-guest/openscad
   Section         : graphics

It builds those binary packages:

  openscad-testing-data - script file based graphical CAD environment (test suite data)
  openscad-testing - script file based graphical CAD environment (test suite)
  openscad - script file based graphical CAD environment

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/openscad/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openscad/openscad_2019.05-4.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 openscad (2019.05-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Make openscad-testrun default to run tests in parallel.
   * Limit --parallel build based on available memory (Closes: #945162).
   * Fix build with newer boost library (Closes: #977225).
   * Clean up some lintian warnings.

 - Kristian.


Reply to: