Bug#969453: RFS: solo-python/0.0.26-1 [ITP] -- command line interface for SoloKeys 2FA security keys

[Philip Rinn <rinni@inventati.org>]

Hi,

anyone willing to sponsor this package? I think having tools around for more 
security keys in Bullseye would be very nice.

Thanks & happy hacking

Philip

On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 10:03 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "solo-python":
>
>  * Package name    : solo-python
>    Version         : 0.0.26-1
>    Upstream Author : SoloKeys <hello@solokeys.com>
>  * URL             : https://github.com/solokeys/solo-python
>  * License         : Apache-2.0 or Expat
>  * Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/rinni/solo-python
>    Section         : utils
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
>   solo-python - command line interface for SoloKeys
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
>
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/solo-python/
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
>   dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/solo-python/solo-python_0.0.26-1.dsc
>
> Changes for the initial release:
>
>  solo-python (0.0.26-1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * Initial release (closes: #958565).
>
>
> My main driver to package this is to have more support for 2FA security keys
> available in Debian.
>
> I own two of those keys and they are very nice devices for general 2FA but they
> can actually do much more e.g. they will gain OpenPGP functionality in the
> future.
>
> I'm aware that the package will not build reproducible at the moment due to
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969352 - I hope we will be able
> to solve this issue before the freeze.
>
> I also asked upstream to sign their releases and will ask them to include a manpage.
>
>
> Best,
> Philip