[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#960831: about RFS: yiyantang



On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:04:16AM +0800, xiao sheng wen (肖盛文) wrote:
> Hi, Paul,Tobias,
> 
>     Thanks for your review.
> 
> I had uploaded the new package, please help to review again.
> 
> About the upstream:
> 
> I can't find any forks that could be new upstream on Internet.

So, congrats for becoming de-facto* upstream then… ;-)

(* due to maintaining a dead-upstream package)

> About the "not using autoreconf":
> 
> If use autoreconf, the build will failed:
> 
> automake: warning: autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac', not
> 'configure.in'
> autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1
> dh_autoreconf: error: autoreconf -f -i returned exit code 1

Yes, I see*. But I fear that needs to be debugged and eventually
be fixed or it will fly right into your face, at some point of time**…

At the very least, config.guess and config.sub needs updating
frequently. (See /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz)

> The source code is old, it use configure.in.
 
(* The reason for the failure seems to be in configure.in:59; but I did not try
anything except commenting out that line; autoreconf suceeds then but configure
fails later.)

(**I'm not saying you need to fix that right away; maybe you are lucky and it
never explodes…)

fix-typo-patch -> Please s/type/typo also in the dep3 headers. [nitpick]

d/copyright:
- You need to have the complete GPL boiler plate in the License text.
Note, if you license debian/* GPL-2*+* you need to have an extra
section for the different license. (GPL-2 != GPL-2+)
- Please also mention the previous maintainers in the debian/* section.

d/rules [nitpick]
- Please wrap the long lines.

Please fix d/copyright and possibly also the nitpicks and I will take
a look again.

-- 
tobi


Reply to: