Em 26/06/2020 08:28, gregor herrmann escreveu: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:36:56 -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: > >> Em 25/06/2020 18:19, Adam Borowski escreveu: >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45:56AM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: >>>> * debian/watch: added a fake site to explain about the current status of the >>>> original upstream homepage. >>> >>> Could you tell me what's the point of the last bit? I see no upside of >>> producing bogus data for the watch file. >> >> The idea there was to show the watch file was not ignored, but there's nothing to >> track actually, it's a dead project, at least for now. >> If someone decide to continue the project, and publish it somewhere, it's just a >> matter to update the watch file. >> Do you think would be better to just not provide the file? > > You can add a watchfile that is empty except for a comment explaining > the situation. > > Cheers, > gregor > That looks good, it's also what lintian recommends right? So I'm gonna go with that. Changed debian/watch to: version=4 # This package does not have an active upstream and the latest upstream # distribution mechanism cannot be meaningfully monitored by uscan. And updated changelog to: * debian/watch: added an empty file exept for a comment to explain about the current status of the upstream distribution site. Looks allright? -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Fabio A. De Muzio Tobich ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 9730 4066 E5AE FAC2 2683 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ D03D 4FB3 B4D3 7EF6 3B2E ⠈⠳⣄ GPG: rsa4096/7EF63B2E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature