[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#961417: RFS: libudfread/1.0.0-1 -- UDF reader library

Hi Paul!

So static libs present in packages like popt are remnants of the past
and the general practice now is to discourage shipping all kinds of
static libraries unless it is Go/OCaml… as mentioned in this wiki page?

I looked at it before, but I try understanding what is considered best practices now.
Vasyl Gello

June 1, 2020 1:57:09 PM UTC, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> написав(-ла):
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 1:42 PM Vasyl Gello wrote:

I often link software statically, especially targeting Android.
So I guess keeping static library won't hurt as part of -dev

Where dynamic libraries are available there are usually only downsides
to static libraries, in Debian we try to not distribute static
libraries unless there is a good reason.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: