Bug#948194: RFS: jcc/3.6-1 [ITA] -- generator for a Python extension from Java classes (transitional)

[Emmanuel Arias <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com>]

Hi Adam,

Sorry for my delay. Now, I think jcc is ready for upload.

Thanks!
Cheers
Emmanuel

El mié., 25 de mar. de 2020 a la(s) 21:12, Adam Borowski
(kilobyte@angband.pl) escribió:
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:14:23AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:03PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> > > El dom., 5 de ene. de 2020 a la(s) 18:40, Adam Borowski
> > > (kilobyte@angband.pl) escribió:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:37:20AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> > > > >  * Package name    : jcc
> > > > >    Version         : 3.6-1
> > > >
> > > > > It builds those binary packages:
> > > > >
> > > > >   python-jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes (Python 2)
> > > > >   python3-jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes (Python 3)
> > > > >   jcc - generator for a Python extension from Java classes (transitional)
> > > >
> > > > [Note: a trip through binNEW is required.]
>
> > I see the changelog still claims:
> >    * Create python-jcc and python3-jcc packages, and make jcc a transitional
> >      one.
> > while neither python-jcc nor jcc remain.
> >
> > Also, a cosmetic issue: "X-Python3-Version: >= 3.3" makes lintian complain
> > about such an ancient relation being useless.  It does no harm, so it's mere
> > cleanup.
>
> Hi!
> The RFS is still rotting, for nothing but a changelog entry.  Should I just
> edit that line and upload as-is?
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ in the beginning was the boot and root floppies and they were good.
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀                                       -- <willmore> on #linux-sunxi
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀