On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:02:03PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote: > > how did you > > resolve the NTK-fork dep and the waf evil? > > About he Waf evil, upstream developer told me this: > > "There was an issue a while I ago that I fixed related to how unique the > shipped WAF binary is. I think it should be in a good place now to use a > system-wide WAF as Debian prefers. That's a misunderstanding, Debian doesn't prefer system-wide WAF and there is no system-wide WAF in Debian: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/02/msg00714.html > The problem with WAF and I think the > reason they bundle it the way they do is they they're constantly making > breaking changes (every time I've upgrade it, it broke something), so it's > hard to imagine that a system-wide WAF install work work for long before > something breaking and requiring everyone to change their wscripts. I guess > that depends on how closely Debian follows upstream on the WAF packages." Yup, that's why Debian discourages using WAF: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#waf > But if I understand it right, waf should be removed totally from the project > via https://wiki.debian.org/UnpackWaf It's not removing, it's unpacking. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature