[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#950885: marked as done (RFS: scons-doc/3.1.2+repack-2 -- Documentation for SCons, a replacement for Make)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Feb 2020 01:57:35 +0100
with message-id <20200209005735.GA24643@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#950885: RFS: scons-doc/3.1.2+repack-2 -- Documentation for SCons, a replacement for Make
has caused the Debian Bug report #950885,
regarding RFS: scons-doc/3.1.2+repack-2 -- Documentation for SCons, a replacement for Make
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
950885: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scons-doc"

   Package name    : scons-doc
   Version         : 3.1.2+repack-2
   Upstream Author : Steven Knight <knight@baldmt.com>
   URL             : https://www.scons.org/
   License         : Expat
   Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/scons-doc
   Section         : doc

It builds those binary packages:

  scons-doc - Documentation for SCons, a replacement for Make

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/scons-doc

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

 dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scons-doc/scons-doc_3.1.2+repack-2.dsc

or from git 

 https://salsa.debian.org/debian/scons-doc/tree/release/debian/3.1.2+repack-2


Changes since the last upload:

   * debian/watch: Add repacksuffix.
   * debian/copyright:
     - Add year 2020 to debian/*.
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.0 (No changes needed).
   * upload to unstable (Closes: #943200).

CU
Jörg Frings-Fürst

-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key        : 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:      https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema:  SYR8SJXB
Wire:     @joergfringsfuerst
Skype:    joergpenguin
Ring:     jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 05:50:51PM +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hallo Adam,
> 
> thanks for your review. I have check it with sbuild and pdebuild again
> and found no error.  The sbuild log is attached.

> Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 20:44 +0100 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> > Alas, it fails at the "clean" stage:
> > ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'distutils.util':

Found the cause: building the binary package works, repacking the source
does not.  Moving python3-distutils from Build-Depends-Indep to
Build-Depends fixes this.  Since severity of this is debatable, and it's no
regression, I've uploaded as-is.  It would still be good if you could fix
this in Git so it'd be picked with your next upload.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The ill-thought conversion to time64_t will make us suffer from
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ the Y292B problem.  So let's move the Epoch by 435451400064000000
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ (plus a safety margin in case of bad physicists) and make it
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ unsigned -- that'll almost double the range.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: