On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:21:04PM +0200, Albert van der Horst wrote: > > Yes it will. But a total rewrite of a Forth compiler is not much effort. > The 32 bit arm compiler was a couple of months of spare time, in fact > a port of the i86 assembler system. > The 64 bit port is a tad more spectacular. > Both are at https://github.com/albertvanderhorst/ciforth/releases git > I received an orange pi 1+ (64 bit arm) in the mail. It was some trouble to > get a linux installed on it. That succeeded about a week ago. > This is the first change that I checked in, mark the date: > " > revision 6.63 > date: 2019-05-21 21:16:03 +0000; author: albert; state: Exp; lines: +12 -9 And what is the git commit hash?? ( e.g. https://github.com/albertvanderhorst/ciforth/commit/12c4697198b0c3113a79ff5e249e4bc0be8cea9a has git commit hash 12c4697198b0c3113a79ff5e249e4bc0be8cea9a ) > Macro cleanup. Removed x86 remainders, i.a. LODS in ciarm.gnr. > Added lina64.cfg and width64.m4 to accomodate the 64 bit assembler on > the Orange 1+. > " > And no I did not learn the Aarch64 7000 page assembler manual by heart > beforehand. > > Forth is a different world. If the RISC V systems come, bring it on! > > Now if in hindsight someone decides that lina may be valuable to Debian, > please contact me. Nobody responded to my RFS. :-( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859130#18 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883702#51 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859130#83 Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature