Bug#941947: RFS: misspell-fixer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Tool for fixing common misspellings, typos in source code

[Lajos Veres <vlajos@gmail.com>]

Thank you.
I have made some small modifications partially to address your
recommendation and the excuses listed here: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/misspell-fixer

- I have removed the mentioned files. https://github.com/vlajos/misspell-fixer/commit/0aeb0ea73e7ce5b0e3c8500886abc57168c8b78c
- Updated the standards-version. https://github.com/vlajos/misspell-fixer/commit/81d9894d8875913cf0d397c99eb88a04a8d50dca
- Added Multi-Arch: foreign. https://github.com/vlajos/misspell-fixer/commit/4f51acf15f22a2ec58a1c317b4563483f6282aa4

But unfortunately most of the remaining excuses are a little unclear for me...
Could you please help me to understand them?

> Rejected due to piuparts regression - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/m/misspell-fixer.html

If I follow the link it says:
piuparts-result: failed-testing 0.1-1

And when I follow this link as well:
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/state-failed-testing.html#misspell-fixer
it says:
misspell-fixer:all (0, 0) (Lajos Veres <vlajos+debian@gmail.com>)
    dependency grep is successfully-tested

So I see only a success message.
I tried to decypher this log:
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/misspell-fixer_0.1-1.log
I see a big list after this line:
ERROR: FAIL: After purging files have disappeared:
But I cannot really figure out how could misspell-fixer's purge remove
them.
When I install the package, removed it, then tried to purge I received
this:
$ apt-get install misspell-fixer
...
$ apt-get remove misspell-fixer
...
$ dpkg --purge misspell-fixer
dpkg: warning: ignoring request to remove misspell-fixer which isn't installed

And this line appears in the above log with a warning.

Could this cause this problem somehow?

> Migration status for misspell-fixer (- to 0.1-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression

Is this one just the end result of the others? Or is there some other
issues I do not see?

> Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by kilobyte, a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration

This buildd related error message is also not really clear for me. Should
I do something differently?

I believe the "too young" will be fixed by time.
And I guess the "not considered" is the result of the others.

Sorry for bothering you with these ones...

Best regards,
Lajos Veres

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, Adam Borowski wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 11:21:15AM +0000, Lajos Veres wrote:
> > Thank you.
> > Do I understand well that removing those 2 files would fix these issues?
>
> Yeah.
>
> > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > There are minor issues such as:
> > > * unused file debian/misspell-fixer-docs.docs
> > > * redundant debian/README.source (Homepage: is a field it two other files
> > >   already)
> > >
> > > but, I've uploaded to NEW as is.
>
>
> Meow!
>

-- 
Lajos Veres
vlajos@gmail.com