[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#947166: RFS: opendkim/2.11.0~alpha-14 [ITA] -- Milter implementation of DomainKeys Identified Mail



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opendkim"

 * Package name    : opendkim
   Version         : 2.11.0~alpha-14
   Upstream Author : The Trusted Domain Project
 * URL             : http://www.opendkim.org/
 * License         : BSD-3-clause and SOSL
 * Vcs             : None
   Section         : mail

It builds those binary packages:

  opendkim - Milter implementation of DomainKeys Identified Mail
  opendkim-tools - Set of command line tools for OpenDKIM
  libopendkim11 - Library for signing and verifying DomainKeys Identified Mail signatures
  libopendkim-dev - Headers and development libraries for the OpenDKIM library
  libvbr2 - Library for RFC 5518 Vouch By Reference (VBR)
  libvbr-dev - Headers and development libraries for the OpenDKIM VBR library
  librbl1 - Library to support a DKIM based RBL system
  librbl-dev - Headers/development libraries for the OpenDKIM RBL library

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/opendkim

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opendkim/opendkim_2.11.0~alpha-14.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * Bump debhelper compat to compatibility level 10
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.3.0
   * debian/watch: Use uscan version 4, tighten URL mangling patterns; also
     remove unused and weak upstream signing key (upstream no longer signs
     release tarballs)
   * debian/copyright: Convert copyright information to DEP 5 format
   * debian/control: Update obsolete Priority "extra" to "optional"
   * Strip trailing whitespace in debian/*

Baby steps … straightforward changes that address Lintian warnings mostly.
Conversion of debian/copyright to DEP 5 yielded the largest diff hunk –
I think it looks good, but let me know if it needs further adjustment.

Cheers,
David


Reply to: