[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Repackaging and its documentation



Hi Mechtilde,

If you removed some non-free files from the original tarball,
a "+dfsg" suffix should be used, and the deleted files should
be annotated in debian/copyright.

If you removed some redundant files already provided by another
package, or added some convenient copy of something, "+ds"
would be a better option and the changes should be annotated
in README.Source.

On 2019-08-17 14:27, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> i start with a new package where i have to repackage the source code.
> The source code include libraries.
> 
> What is the right naming?
> 
> I know +dfsg for license reason.
> 
> but what is the definition for +ds or +repack or something else.
> 
> I alreada read
> 
>  *
> [[https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debmake-doc/ch05.en.html#dfsg|debmake-doc]]
>  * [[https://perl-team.pages.debian.net/howto/repacking.html|Perl-Team]]
>  *
> [[https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch06.html#bpp-origtargz|Developer-Reference]]
> 
> and collect these inforamtion under
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/Repackaging
> 
> Can you give me some examples for good pratice to handle the different
> suffices?
> 
> Kind regards


Reply to: