[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#932547: marked as done (RFS: desktopfolder/1.1.0-2 -- Organize your desktop with panels, notes and photos)



Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:49:40 +0000
with message-id <E1hqLOW-000EjW-GY@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#932547: fixed in desktopfolder 1.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #932547,
regarding RFS: desktopfolder/1.1.0-2 -- Organize your desktop with panels, notes and photos
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
932547: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932547
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "desktopfolder"

 * Package name    : desktopfolder
   Version         : 1.1.0-2
   Upstream Author : José Amuedo Salmerón joseamuedo@gmail.com
 * URL             : https://github.com/spheras/desktopfolder
 * License         : GPL-3+
   Section         : x11

  It builds those binary packages:

    desktopfolder - Organize your desktop with panels, notes and photos

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/desktopfolder


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/desktopfolder/desktopfolder_1.1.0-2.dsc

 Notes:

This is preemptive upload.  I noticed that the experimental repo has uplifted
to using vala 0.44.  DesktopFolder does not build with this version of vala

--- End Message ---

Reply to: