Bug#931377: RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:00:27PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> ср, 3 июл. 2019 г. в 18:52, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>:
> > It's a pity neither Guo nor you managed to update the docs before Buster,
> > but 1. we can upload this to buster-backports soon,
>
> Should I do anything manually to do this upload?
There's nothing we can do before this package passes NEW and migrates to
testing.
> > and 2. there's a nice
> > fresh Bullseye open for uploads within the migration delay.
>
> For now they are waiting in NEW.
Right.
> > It'd be great if you could do gcc-9-doc as well.
>
> Sure, I'll take a look within a month (or if gcc-9 is uploaded to unstable).
Heh, I'm way too eager here -- I believed gcc-9 is long since in unstable,
merely not in buster.
> For now my priority would be to push updated gcc-doc-defaults to unstable
> (packages are ready, you can check them on mentors.debian.net).
Right; let's wait for ftpfolks.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Packager's rule #1: upstream _always_ screws something up. This
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ is true especially if you're packaging your own project.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
Reply to: