On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:47:39PM -0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2019-02-25, Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Nicholas, > > > >> heaptrack (1.1.0+20180922.gitf752536-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium > >> > >> * Non-maintainer upload. > >> * Update description to make heaptrack more discoverable to users. > >> (Closes: #915241) > >> > >> -- Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:44:03 -0700 > > > > Whilst I agree about the poor visibility I don't think this > > warrants a non-maintainer upload (or even a "normal"-level > > severity…) especially during a freeze so I will not be sponsoring > > this upload. Apologies. > > Maybe the fact that heaptrack-gui doesn't depend on either heaptrack nor > libheaptrack might be a rc bug. and maybe this can be sneaked in ? :) > > /Sune > I did however find this W: heaptrack source: inconsistent-appstream-metadata-license src/analyze/gui/org.kde.heaptrack.appdata.xml (cc0-1.0 != lgpl-2.1+) which feels RCish, but not RC, because <metadata_license>CC0-1.0</metadata_license> <project_license>GPL-2.0+</project_license> and this file falls under Files: * Copyright: 2014-2017 Milian Wolff <mail@milianw.de> License: LGPL-2.1+ Presumably the resolution would be to note that this appdata.xml file is CC0-1.0 in debian/copyright. Cheers, Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature