[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#923102: Fwd: Re: Bug#923102: RFS: xsoldier/1:1.8-6 [ITA] -- shoot 'em up game with the "not shooting" bonus






-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : Re: Bug#923102: RFS: xsoldier/1:1.8-6 [ITA] -- shoot 'em up game with the "not shooting" bonus
Date : Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:42:27 +0100
De : Sebastien CHAVAUX <seb95.scou@gmail.com>
Pour : Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>


Currently, there is no major change in Salsa:

vcswatch reports that this package appears to have a new changelog entry (version 1: 1.8-6, UNRELEASED distribution) and new commits in its VCS. You should ask yourself if it's time to download.

Here are the relevant validation messages:

commit b0bf9b7584773b3915d4c39103bf067440ee612b
Author: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk>
Date: Sat 29 Sep 01:02:44 2018 +0100

Cut the spaces at the end.

Fix lintian: file-includes-trailing-whitespace
See https://lintian.debian.org/tags/file-contains-trailing-whitespace.html for more details.

commit 44e0387a81258ef0e76d21c85412a1e195068f8d
Author: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk>
Date: Sat 29 Sep 01:02:42 2018 +0100

Use the secure copyright file specification URI.

Fix lintian: insecure-copyright-format-uri
See https://lintian.debian.org/tags/insecure-copyright-format-uri.html for more details.

cordially seb



Le 24/02/2019 à 23:44, Adam Borowski a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:37:53AM +0100, Sebastien CHAVAUX wrote:
I would like to adopt the xsoldier package, considering that it does not
change much or little and requires little in consequence.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xsoldier"
* Package name : xsoldier
Version : 1:1.8-6
Changes since the last upload:

xsoldier (1:1.8-6) unstable; urgency=medium

* New maintainer. (Closes: #738879)

-- Sebastien CHAVAUX <seb95.scou@gmail.com> Sun, 24 Feb 2019 07:41:00 +0100
Would you have any changes other than to stake a claim? It's pretty
pointless to make an upload only to change the Maintainer field.


Meow!

Reply to: