Re: Bug#921843: discosnp has unsatisfiable dependencies
Control: tags -1 help moreinfo
Hi,
I really wonder why gatb-core should be missing. According to
tracker[1] gatb-core is in testing and the build logs[2] are specifying
exactly those architectures as successfully installed that you claim
missing (in agreement with discosnp tracker page[3] admittedly but
not more enlightening to me).
Any idea what might be wrong here and how to fix this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gatb-core
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gatb-core
[3] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/discosnp
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 12:48:07PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:discosnp
> Version: 2.3.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster
>
> Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/amd64
> Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/arm64
> Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/i386
> Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/mips64el
> Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/ppc64el
> Impossible Depends: discosnp -> gatb-core/s390x
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging@alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: