Bug#849754: Processed: RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > retitle 849754 RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
> Bug #849754 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
> Changed Bug title to 'RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.1-1/0.0.1-1 [ITP]'.
Thanks for correcting this one, seems I have misunderstood the
documentation regarding bug naming.
I uploaded a new test-build of the package to
https://mentors.debian.net/package/guerillabackup
to verify, that gbp/salsa-build still works and no new lintian
errors/warnings due to new rules are reported.
*******************************************************************
CAVEAT on sponsoring: I detected by chance, that outbound messages
from bugs.debian.org were corrupted under some conditions, affecting
some part of the mentoring/sponsorship communication process.
If due to greylisting someone happened to read message from the
bug tracker before receiving the message addressed directly (quite
likely), the content of the message might have been largely
truncated, thus looking like being an incomplete answer to mentor
feedback.
While the messages sent out from bugs.debian.org were corrupted,
the bug tracker web interface will show the complete, unmodified
message initially sent. If you were wondering about my strange
replies, please check
https://bugs.debian.org/849714
https://bugs.debian.org/849754
Sorry about the inconvenience!
hd
Reply to: