[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#921373: RFS: codelite [QA] -- Powerful and lightweight IDE



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for an update of the orphaned package "codelite"

  * Package name    : codelite
    Version         : 12.0+dfsg-1
    Upstream Author : eranif <eran.ifrah@gmail.com>
  * URL             : https://codelite.org
  * License         : GPL2+
    Section         : devel

It builds these binary packages:

  codelite -- Powerful and lightweight IDE
  codelite-plugins -- Powerful and lightweight IDE - plugins


To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/codelite


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/codelite/codelite_12.0+dfsg-1.dsc

There is also a git repo:
 https://github.com/dghart/debian-salsa-codelite-clone 
which is a clone of
 https://salsa.debian.org/debian/codelite
to which afaict I can't upload.

After being RFA for some time, codelite is now orphaned: see #852312.
It still provides version 10.0, while the upstream version is 12.0. I've
updated the package to 12.0 and made other minor fixes.

This is a request for a review and upload of the update. The amended package
builds and works, and is lintian-clean apart from the warning:
 orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian-infrastructure.

Changes since the last upload:

codelite (12.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * QA upload.

  * New upstream release.

  * debian/codelite-plugins.install:
    - Install new plugins.
  * debian/copyright:
    - Add copyright for new plugin.
    - Update copyright dates.
  * debian/patches:
    - Refresh patches.
    - Backport a fix for LLDB terminal crashes.
    - Fix 3 more spelling mistakes.
  * debian/control:
    - Bump standards to 4.3.0.
  * debian/compat:
    - Use debhelper 11.
  * debian/watch:
    - Add oversionmangle for +dfsg


Regards,

David Hart


Reply to: