Bug#909117: marked as done (RFS: libmd5-rfc/0.0+20020413-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20180919084940.gho45asb2cmecigx@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#909117: RFS: libmd5-rfc/0.0+20020413-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #909117,
regarding RFS: libmd5-rfc/0.0+20020413-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
909117: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libmd5-rfc"
* Package name : libmd5-rfc
Version : 0.0+20020413
Upstream Author : Aladdin Enterprises
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/libmd5-rfc/
* License : zlib
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libmd5-rfc-dev - RFC1321-based (RSA-free) MD5 library - development headers
libmd5-rfc0 - RFC1321-based (RSA-free) MD5 library
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libmd5-rfc
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libj/libmd5-rfc/libmd5-rfc_0.0+20020413-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #909116)
Regards,
Yangfl
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:31:40AM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> 于2018年9月19日周三 上午3:22写道：
> >
> > But, with md5 thoroughly broken, do you have any reason to include this
> > library? It's unfit for cryptographic purposes, and there exist much faster
> > hashes for non-crypto uses.
>
> Actually https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=typedef+unsigned+int+md5_word_t
Ah, so many uses in the archive. Thanks for pointing this out.
> But, if you think bundling is fine, I won't insist on pushing this package.
Packaged libraries are greatly superior to bundling.
In NEW.
喵!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ What Would Jesus Do, MUD/MMORPG edition:
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ • multiplay with an admin char to benefit your mortal [Mt3:16-17]
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ • abuse item cloning bugs [Mt14:17-20, Mt15:34-37]
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ • use glitches to walk on water [Mt14:25-26]
--- End Message ---
Reply to: