Bug#897642: RFS: gpgme1.0/1.11.1-1~bpo9+1
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Jacob,
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Jacob Adams <tookmund@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gpgme1.0"
Thanks for your interest in contribution to debian!
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> gpgme1.0 (1.11.1-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
>
> * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
>
> -- Jacob Adams <tookmund@gmail.com> Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:13:54 -0400
>
>
> This package will also require libgpgerror, which you can find here:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgpg-error
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgpg-error/libgpg-error_1.29-4~bpo9+1.dsc
>
> It already has an RFS: #897045
>
> I would like to be able to use the latest version of GPGME in my GSoC
> 2018 project. In order to do that I would prefer to use a backport as
> the PGP Clean Room CD is based off of stretch.
I see the project seems already released as beta [1], so maybe there's
no need to do this backports upload?
And what's the benefit for this backports pkg? Any new feature or
bugfix you're particularly interested in?
BTW. I just uploaded gnupg 2.2 to stretch-backports, to fix #906545
[2]. And I see your RFS.
[1] https://tookmund.com/2018/07/pgp-clean-room-beta
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/906545
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Reply to: