On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:10:41AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-05-25 at 09:47, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:48:23PM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> >> Package: sponsorship-requests
> >> Severity: normal
> >
> > This should be mailed to submit@bugs.d.o, not the mailing list. It
> > did not get a tracking bug this way, thus those who use the BTS as
> > their primary view wouldn't notice it.
>
> Actually, the original mail as I received it *did* have s@b.d.o in the
> To: list; it just also had the mailing list's address present explicitly.
>
> How the software which normally results in a RFS bug getting passed on
> to this mailing list handles that situation I'm not sure.
Indeed:
} To: "submit@bugs.debian.org" <submit@bugs.debian.org>,
} "895785@bugs.debian.org" <895785@bugs.debian.org>, Arnaud Fontaine
} <arnau@debian.org>, "python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org"
} <python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Debian Mentors List
} <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
And a bug _was_ created (#900041), just somehow not forwarded to this list.
Probably because the list was already in the "To:" field.
Closing it then, thanks for noticing.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .globl _start↵.data↵rc: .ascii "/etc/init.d/rcS\0"↵.text↵_start
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ mov $57,%rax↵syscall↵cmp $0,%rax↵jne child↵parent:↵mov $61,%rax
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ mov $-1,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall↵jmp parent↵child:
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ mov $59,%rax↵mov $rc,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall