On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:37:27 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote: > > Well my problem is that upstream's software is intended to build just > > an executable and I'm building a shared library. > This is even more important problem. Are you sure you can do it properly? I will contact upstream to see if she is insterested in autotoolize her software and give her a hand with that. In the meantime, I think the package is building and working properly; I did some tests linking litle programs with the library, executing, ... > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:50:07 +0100 > Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote: > There's also a third way: as debian/rules is a makefile, it can do whatever > you want. Patching the upstream Makefile is good when you want to amend or > change some issue, not when you replace it completely. Thank you Adam, I followed your advice and moved all building instructions to debian/rules. Source package is uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fathom dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fathom/fathom_1.0-1.dsc And the repository at: https://salsa.debian.org/josgalo-guest/fathom.git If someone can review it and believes it's correct, I will open an RFS bug. Regards,
Attachment:
pgpWrXI_LVsHG.pgp
Description: PGP signature