Bug#914075: julia-vim/0.0+git20181115.ef55a5-1 [QA]
Some comments on your packaging:
1. Please use "Expat" instead of "MIT" in copyright. There are some
variants of the MIT license, and "Expat" specifies exactly one of them.
2. Before you decide the name of a package, do some search would be
helpful. For example, $ apt list vim-\* gives you a long list of vim
plugins, while $ apt list \*-vim only prints several packages.
It's obvious that "vim-julia" is more consistent to convention.
3. Uscan supports git mode, which monitors the HEAD of a git repo.
At the time of writing, the 0.No-Release watch file is no longer a
The rest part of your package is very similar to mine. And your
autopkgtest test case and metadata file can be merged into
Julia team's repo.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:11:26PM -0200, Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana wrote:
> I forgot to say, this is the RFP:
> Best regards,
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:02:42 +0000
> Mo Zhou <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Hi Paulo,
> > What does this bug mean? We (Debian Julia Team) are maintaining the
> > vim-julia package, and it has been waiting in the NEW queue.
> > https://salsa.debian.org/julia-team/vim-julia
> > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/vim-julia_0.0~git20180821.120a0b6-1.html
> Oh, my mistake.
> I was looking for a software to package and I found julia-vim with RFP.
> I am going to back the bug from ITP to RFP, and ask Mike if he can just review
> my package but don't upload it.
> Best regards,
> Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana (phls)
> Curitiba - Brasil
> Membro da Comunidade Curitiba Livre
> Site: http://www.phls.com.br
> GNU/Linux user: 228719 GPG ID: 0443C450
> Apoie a campanha pela igualdade de gênero #HeForShe (#ElesPorElas)