Bug#907803: closed by Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> (Re: Bug#907803: RFS: udfclient/0.8.9-1)
On Monday 03 September 2018 01:15:28 Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:37:43PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 September 2018 21:33:03 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Nitpick: these warnings are trivial to fix:
> > > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-2-clause (paragraph at line 37)
> > > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-2-clause (paragraph at line 62)
> > > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-4-clause (paragraph at line 149)
> > > so it'd be nice if you could get rid of them in the future. Not an
> > > important thing, but less noise is good.
> >
> > How to fix this problem? There are basically 3 different texts of BSD
> > licenses in source files.
>
> You need to give them unique names. If the body of a license is different,
> so must be its short name.
>
> Yeah, that's somewhat unpleasant, but the reason is obvious.
Ok. So which short names should I use? I used "bsd-*-clause" name as described in table at:
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-short-name
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
Reply to: