[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#902700: Bug#902731: RFS: pulseeffects/4.1.1-3 [ITP]



Hello Andrey,

Thanks for the reply. Let's start with package 'pulseeffects'. I have uploaded new version upstream version 4.1.2, now all Lintian warning, except missing man, have been fixed: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseeffects

> he packages shouldn't be native, they should have a proper orig tarball and a separate packaging dir I set debian/format/source to '3.0 (git)'. It seems to work. I keep my debian specs in git and don't want to manually package tarbools, '3.0 (git)' seems to be the solution.

> most of the versions are wrong for various reasons
Is it correct here?

> probably all packages don't have ITP bugs filed
PulseEffects does have an ITP bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881224

Please check https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseeffects. Is it ready for Debian repository? If yes, what are the following actions?

30.06.2018 16:07, Andrey Rahmatullin пишет:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 01:38:13AM +0300, =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?=@bendel.debian.org wrote:
   To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

   https://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-plugin-window-merge
   https://mentors.debian.net/package/apt-btrfs-snapshot
  https://mentors.debian.net/package/hw-probe
   https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseeffects
I'm going to reply to all these RFSes with one email because they share
mostly the same lists of problems.

- fix your "from" email
- the packages shouldn't be native, they should have a proper orig tarball
   and a separate packaging dir
- most of the versions are wrong for various reasons
- all packages have lots of lintian problems even on their mentors pages,
   please fix them
- probably all packages don't have ITP bugs filed, you should have done
   that before starting the packaging work but it should be done anyway

Please reply to specific bugs to discuss specific packages.




Reply to: