Bug#861649: Newer version uploaded

[Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:24:53 +0100 Gard Spreemann <gspreemann@gmail.com
> 
> Upstream provided a patch that fixes this. I've updated
> 
>  https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.1.0+dfsg
-1.dsc

Thanks!

But the lintian stuff I complained about is not completly fixed, there
is even a new tag: 
I: gudhi source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-external-doc-
resources.patch

Please run lintian after every build! Best, include it into pbuilder or
like! Remember "some sponsors are evil and pedantic [1] when running
lintian. 

[1]  https://nthykier.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/some-sponsors-are-evil-a
nd-pedantic/

Those linitian messages should be fixed before an upload:
(As at least partially already asked for in earlier reviews)

N: Starting on group gudhi/2.1.0+dfsg-1
N: Unpacking packages in group gudhi/2.1.0+dfsg-1
N: ----
N: Processing changes file gudhi (version 2.1.0+dfsg-1, arch source
amd64 all) ...
N: ----
N: Processing source package gudhi (version 2.1.0+dfsg-1, arch source)
...
I: gudhi source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section"
in package gudhui
P: gudhi source: file-contains-trailing-whitespace debian/control (line
110)
P: gudhi source: package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 10
I: gudhi source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-external-doc-
resources.patch
W: gudhi source: unnecessary-testsuite-autopkgtest-field
N: ----
N: Processing binary package python3-gudhi (version 2.1.0+dfsg-1, arch
amd64) ...
I: python3-gudhi: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/python3/dist-
packages/gudhi.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so ment meant
I: python3-gudhi: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/python3/dist-
packages/gudhi.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so preambule preamble
I: python3-gudhi: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/python3/dist-
packages/gudhi.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so choosen chosen
N: ----
N: Processing binary package libgudhi-examples (version 2.1.0+dfsg-1,
arch all) ...
W: libgudhi-examples: lib-recommends-documentation recommends:
libgudhi-doc
N: ----
N: Processing binary package libgudhi-doc (version 2.1.0+dfsg-1, arch
all) ...
I: libgudhi-doc: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
N: ----
N: Processing binary package libgudhi-dev (version 2.1.0+dfsg-1, arch
all) ...
N: ----
N: Processing binary package python3-gudhi-dbgsym (version 2.1.0+dfsg-
1, arch amd64) ...
N: ----
N: Processing binary package gudhui (version 2.1.0+dfsg-1, arch amd64)
...
I: gudhui: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/gudhui preambule preamble
P: gudhui: no-upstream-changelog
W: gudhui: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/gudhui

 
Please review d/copyright. I found at least one undocumented file which
is licensed Apache 2.0 and another one under LGPL3+. Neither are in 
d/copyright.

Again, remove moreinfo when ready.

--

tobi