[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#889570: RFS: libt3window/0.3.0-1



Hi Adam,

My apologies for these scripting fails. I've fixed and re-uploaded the
package (double checking that this time I didn't mangle the changelog).

Best regards,
Gertjan Halkes

On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:37:22 +0100, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote:

>On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 04:57:49PM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
>> * Package name    : libt3window
>>   Version         : 0.3.0-1  
>
>>   https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libt/libt3key/libt3window_0.3.0-1.dsc  
>
>Obviously /libt3window/.
>
>> Changes since the last upload:
>> 
>>   * New upstream release.
>> 
>> The new upstream release improves line drawing, updates internal tables
>> to Unicode 10.0 and fixes some small bugs.  
>
>Alas, the changelog looks mangled:
>
>diff -Nru libt3window-0.2.6/debian/changelog libt3window-0.3.0/debian/changelog
>--- libt3window-0.2.6/debian/changelog  2017-12-30 09:35:12.000000000 +0100
>+++ libt3window-0.3.0/debian/changelog  2018-02-04 13:25:17.000000000 +0100
>@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
>-libt3window (0.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
>+libt3window (0.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * New upstream release.
> 
>- -- Gertjan Halkes <debian@ghalkes.nl>  Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:35:12 +0100
>+ -- Gertjan Halkes <debian@ghalkes.nl>  Sun, 04 Feb 2018 13:25:17 +0100
> 
>-libt3window (0.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
>+libt3window (0.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * Initial release. (Closes: #885597)
> 
>- -- Gertjan Halkes <debian@ghalkes.nl>  Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:43:24 +0100
>+ -- Gertjan Halkes <debian@ghalkes.nl>  Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:35:12 +0100
>
>
>I see nothing wrong in the actual contents of the package, though.
>
>
>Meow!
>-- 
>⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The bill with 3 years prison for mentioning Polish concentration
>⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ camps is back.  What about KL Warschau (operating until 1956)?
>⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Zgoda?  Łambinowice?  Most ex-German KLs?  If those were "soviet
>⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ puppets", Bereza Kartuska?  Sikorski's camps in UK (thanks Brits!)?
>


Reply to: