[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#887665: RFS: usbguard/0.7.1+ds-1

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:34:37PM +0100, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard"
> * Package name     : usbguard
>   Version          : 0.7.1+ds-1

> Changes since last upload:
>   * New upstream version 0.7.1 (Closes: #868160)

The bug you're closing is not "please package new upstream".  Thus,
this part should be:

  * New upstream version 0.7.1
    + Fix failure with read-only /etc (Closes: #868160)

>   * remove dh-systemd due to being part of debhelper (>= 9.20160709)
>   * bump standards version
>   * add correct section to libusbguard0
>   * remove parsing of dpkg-genchangelog
>   * updated the watch file for the new github url, modified the archive name
>     so the correct version will be used and removed the signature line, as
>     that version is not signed
>   * remove patches that have been upstreamed
>   * add asciidoctor to build depends

Please run lintian before requesting sponsoring; it automates checking for
most of likely problems, saving time for both you and me:

E: usbguard changes: unreleased-changes

The package is explicitely marked as "not for uploading" (ie, is meant for
testing, review and further work).  As you filed the RFS, I guess it's not
what you wanted...

W: usbguard source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/usbguard.postinst

Debhelper wants to add further things to the postinst, but doesn't know

W: usbguard source: debian-watch-could-verify-download debian/upstream/signing-key.asc

The new version is not signed; you should then delete (or rename away) this
key to mark the lack of signature as intentional.

⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ sky.  Your cat demands food.  The priority should be obvious...

Reply to: