Bug#886606: RFS: pokemmo-installer/1.4.5-1 [ITP] -- Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:50:55AM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pokemmo-installer"
> * Package name : pokemmo-installer
> Version : 1.4.5-1
> Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes <email@example.com>
> * URL : https://github.com/coringao/pokemmo-installer
> * License : GPL-3+
> Section : games
> It builds those binary packages:
> pokemmo-installer - Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pokemmo-installer/pokemmo-installer_1.4.5-1.dsc
> This package is from the previous version of "pokemmo/1.4.3-1", follows the Debian Bug report logs.
You should have recycled that RFS bug, same for the ITP.. (by e.g retitleing)
But, ok, we can work with the new ones.. I've merged the ITP bugs already.
> Changes since the last upload:
> **changelog version: 1.4.5**
> * Updated desktop file
> * Updated the readme description
> * Changed program name for 'PokeMMO Installer'
> * Rename the binary package to 'pokemmo-installer'
> * Updated executable script main
> * Rename the manpage to 'pokemmo-installer.6'
> * Updated the description of the manpage
There are more changes than this... However,
- we need to target contrib. It is not ok to go for main, so please change that back.
- the long description: I think something like the last sentence from my
propsoal would help to transport the message that this package is not
PokeMMO, but I'm not 100% happy with it myself, so I somehow
understand that you did not embed it. But I think we need something
to underline that the real thing is some other property.
"PokeMMO is a product from PokeMMO.eu, please see their
website for details and further information."
- another question: The pokemmo.png .. Can you elaborate about the
source of the image? The license could be troublesome...