Re: Help to clarify an issue
Em 31-12-2017 15:38, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
>> an second opinion?
>>
>> [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
>>
>> We disagree when an NMU is necessary and how
>> important the request is.
>
> wow - wtf.
>
> I'll keep my comments here structured:
>
> 1) I believe Jonathan is very very hasty on making NMUs
> a) whilst true that NMUs today are seen very much with a nicer eye than
> in the past, it's still considered not something to do lightly, not
> even when somebody is on the LowNMU list or the package is in
> collab-maint
> b) also, upload an NMU the day after saying he has a patch and 3 days
> after the original bug report is totally hasty, no matter the delay
> c) and usually as soon as the maintainer replies to a bug all the
> intentions to NMU drops in favour of a team upload (unless the
> maintainer asks for a NMU, as it often happens)
> 2) I totally don't understand what's Herbert's problem with the
> proposal, providing /usr/bin/duc from both the regular and -nox
> package sounds a very nice idea to me
>
>
The problem is: Why think about this if an alias, an alias,
gives what he wants. Why spend more than a minute with this.
> Summary: please just stop meta-discussing whether or not a NMU was the
> appropriate action to take, and start discussing the actual bug, with
> neither party being so stubborn as it looks from my side.
I sent an email to mentors because the way things are going
he will make another upload. No delay, not nothing. Just upload.
I am stopping.
Reply to: